Cilt:2 Sayı:1 Yıl:2022

Akademik Dünyanın Gizli Yönü Akademik Stalk: Meraklarımız ‘Akademik Tecessüs’ten mi, Yoksa ‘Akademik Tahassüs’ten mi Geliyor?

The Hidden Aspect of the Academic World Academic Stalk: Do Our Curiosities Come From 'Academic Prying’ or From 'Academic Tahassus’?

  • Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Ahmet ALKAN, Sıddıka ÇAM, Atiye KÜÇÜKKÜTÜK, Melisa CÖMERT

  • Yayın Dili :

    Türkçe

    Makale Türü :

    Araştırma Makalesi

    Geliş Tarihi :


    Kabul Tarihi :


Extended Summary

Man is a curious creature by nature. Curiosity starting from childhood and the desire to know the environment continue in later ages. However, due to the nature of life and profession, the subjects of interest may differ. It is important to learn with what intention, in which fields and in what way the curiosity, which is also the cornerstone of the academic world, is realized.

The aim of the research is to learn the connotation, causes, channels and results of academic stalking. For this purpose, face-to-face and online interviews were conducted with a total of twenty-three participants, fifteen academicians and eight graduate students. Then the interviews were transcribed and subjected to content analysis.

As a result of the analysis, academic stalking association was divided into two as academic and social life. The main reason for academic stalking has emerged as a sense of curiosity. It has been found that this sense of curiosity arises from introspection and tahassus. The channels of academic stalking were examined under two themes, academic life and social life. Social life theme is personality, social shares and ideology; The academic life theme was examined under the headings of scientific meetings, academic publications and academic relations. When it is considered in terms of academic stalking results, it has been found that these results, which may have positive and negative consequences, will determine the intention (investigation, commitment) of stalking. Among the positive effects of academic stalking, finding a new study topic, being happy and motivated by the sharing of teachers, specialization; Among the negative effects, it has been determined that there are alienation from the teachers, waste of time, open search and hostility.

As a result of this research, which is a conceptualization study, definitions of academic stalking, academic prying and academic tahassus were made.

Kaynakça
  • Akmeşe, Z. ve Deniz, K. (2017). Stalk, benliğin izini sürmek. Ege Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Yeni Düşünceler, 8, 23–32.
  • Aygül, H. H., Apak, F. ve Akgül, M. (2020). Stalk(er): Instagram mekanında gözetim ve gözetleme. H. H. Aygül ve E. Eke (Ed.), Dijital bağımlılık ve e-hastalıklar içinde (385-403), Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
  • Bilgin, N. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde içerik analizi teknikler ve örnek çalışmalar. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
  • Cambridge Dictionary. (2021). Stalk. Erişim adresi: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/tr/sözlük/ingilizce-türkçe/stalk, (06.10.2021).
  • Cansever, A. B. (2019). Instagram’da benliğin sunumu ve stalk eylemi: Marmara üniversitesi iletişim fakültesi öğrencileri üzerine nitel bir araştırma. 3. Marmara İletişim Öğrencileri Kongresi, İstanbul, Türkiye.
  • Çağrıcı, M. (2011). “Tecessüs” içinde, TDV İslam Ansiklopedisi 40. Cilt, Erişim adresi: https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/tecessus (02.04.2022).
  • Eşitti, Ş. (2021). Covid 19 pandemisi sırası ve sonrası dijital gözetim ve toplumsal kontrol sorunsalı üzerine eleştirel bir inceleme. Communication and Technology Congress, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Etimoloji. (2022). Cass. Erişim adresi: www.etimolojiturkce.com/kelime/tecessüs, (30.11. 2021).
  • Fasih Arapça. (2022). Tefe“ul. Erişim adresi: https://fasiharapca.com/tefe-ul-babi/4121 (30.11. 2021).
  • Güme, S. (2018). Sosyal stalk kültürünün gelişimi. Yılmaz E. ve Güme S. (Ed.). Toplum ve kültür içinde (39-51), İstanbul: Kriter Yayınevi.
  • Güngör, N. (2016), İslam hukukunda özel hayat kavramı ve günümüz uygulamaları, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, IV, 69-94.
  • Heinrich, P. A. (2015). Generation istalk: an examination of the prior relationship between victims of stalking and offenders. Master Thesis, Marshall University, West Virginia, United States.
  • Karali, S. (2017), Kur’ân-ı Kerim’de zan, tecessüs ve gıybet kavramları arası ilişki ve bu ilişkinin bireysel ve toplumsal yansımaları. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi Bursa, Türkiye.
  • Kılıç, S. (2018). Kur’ân’da tefekkürün semantik evreni. Diyanet İlmî Dergi, 54(4), 41-86.
  • Kocabay, N. (2016). Eğlencenin gözetleme hâli ya da eğlence endüstrisinde “görünen” ve “gören” olmak. TRT Akademi, 1(1), 50-70.
  • Luggat. (2022). Tahassüs. Erişim adresi: https://www.luggat.com/index.php#ceviri (30.11. 2021).
  • Lyon, D. (2013). Gözetim çalışmaları: genel bir bakış. (Çev: A. Toprak), İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayınevi.
  • Oxford Dictionary. (2021). Cyberstalking. Erişim adresi: https://www.lexico.com/definition/cyberstalking, (07.10.2021).
  • Sheridan, L. P., Blaauw, E., and Davies, G. M. (2003). Stalking: knowns and unknowns. trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4(2), 148–162.
  • Şan, M. K. ve Şimşek, R. (2011), Sosyal sermaye kavramının tarihsel-sosyolojik arkaplanı, Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 6(1), 88-110.
  • Tecer, A. K. (2011). TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi 40. cilt, 245-246. Erişim adresi: https://cdn2.islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/dosya/40/C40013122.pdf (02.09.2022).

Bu Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler