Abstract
Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu’s Homo Academicus, this study examines the academic positioning of scholars working in district-based vocational schools in Turkiye, the forms of symbolic stigmatization they are exposed to, and the informal power and counter-hegemonic strategies they develop under these structural conditions. Through everyday and demeaning metaphors such as “small-town academic” and “the filler material of the university,” the study analyzes the invisible domination and exclusion experienced by provincial academics within the framework of center–periphery relations.
The research is designed as a qualitative study. Data were collected through in-depth interviews conducted with 11 academics working at district vocational schools affiliated with Isparta University of Applied Sciences and analyzed using thematic analysis. The study focuses on three main research questions: (1) How are academics working in district vocational schools positioned within the academic field? (2) What structural and symbolic problems do they encounter? (3) Which theoretical frameworks can explain the informal power and counter-power strategies developed in response to these problems?
The findings reveal that provincial academics face multiple structural and symbolic challenges, including exclusion from recruitment processes, unequal teaching loads, lack of representation in decision-making mechanisms, and persistent symbolic stigmatization. At the same time, the study demonstrates that these academics construct effective informal counter-power domains through practices of silent resistance, hidden transcripts, solidarity networks, local legitimacy production, and the strategy of becoming a “consulted actor.” The study argues that small-town academics should not be viewed merely as passive or marginal actors; rather, they constitute a distinctive analytical category that reveals the invisible politics, informal power relations, and symbolic struggles shaping the academic field.
Extended Summary
Purpose
This study aims to analyze the academic positioning of scholars working in district-based vocational schools in Turkiye and to examine the forms of symbolic stigmatization they experience within the academic field. Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu’s Homo Academicus, the research seeks to understand how center–periphery relations operate inside universities and how academics located in structurally peripheral institutions develop informal power and counter-hegemonic strategies. In this context, the study conceptualizes “small-town academia” as a distinctive analytical category that reveals the invisible politics and symbolic hierarchies of higher education.
Method
The study adopts a qualitative research design. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 11 academics working at district vocational schools affiliated with Isparta University of Applied Sciences. Participants represent different academic ranks and disciplinary backgrounds. The interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis, focusing on academic positioning, symbolic exclusion, informal power practices, and counter-power strategies. The analytical framework integrates Ibn Khaldun’s center–periphery and nomadic–sedentary distinction, Bourdieu’s Homo Academicus and symbolic capital, Şerif Mardin’s center–periphery analysis, Arslan’s epistemic community approach, and Foucault’s power–discipline perspective, complemented by Scott’s “hidden transcripts” and Goffman’s stigma theory, as well as the Turkish informal power literature associated with the Isparta School.
Findings
The findings indicate that academics working in district vocational schools face multiple structural and symbolic challenges, including exclusion from recruitment and promotion processes, unequal teaching loads, limited access to research resources, and underrepresentation in formal decision-making mechanisms. These disadvantages are reinforced by stigmatizing discourses such as “small-town academic” and “the filler material of the university,” which function as symbolic tools of marginalization.
At the same time, the study reveals that district academics are not merely passive recipients of domination. They actively construct informal counter-power domains through practices of silent resistance, the production of hidden transcripts, solidarity networks, local legitimacy-building, in particular through the strategy of becoming a “consulted actor.” These practices enable them to gain informal influence and symbolic recognition despite their limited formal authority.
Contribution
This study makes three main contributions to the literature. First, it shifts the focus from formal organizational structures to informal power relations and symbolic struggles within higher education institutions. Second, it introduces “small-town academia” as an original analytical category for understanding district-based vocational schools in Turkiye. Third, it extends the Homo Academicus framework beyond elite and central institutions, demonstrating its explanatory power in peripheral academic contexts. Overall, the study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of academic power, center–periphery relations, and informal governance in contemporary higher education systems.
Kaynakça
- Alkan, A. (2018). Örgütlerde informal güç olgusu: Hastane çalışanları üzerine nitel bir araştırma (Doktora tezi). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sağlık Yönetimi Anabilim Dalı.
- Alkan, A., & Erdem, R. (2019). Güç: Formal ve informal yönden güce kavramsal bir bakış. Vizyoner Dergisi, 10(24), 405–433. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.472535
- Apalı, Y. (2021). Michel Foucault’da iktidar ve güç. MAKÜ Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.31200/makuubd.984887
- Arslan, H. (2022). Epistemik cemaat: Bir bilim sosyolojisi denemesi. Paradigma Yayınları.
- Bourdieu, P. (2021). Homo academicus (N. Ökten, A. N. Kocasu, & E. Gülsey, Çev.). İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Bozkurt, N. O. (2017). Yükseköğretim kurumlarındaki güç ilişkilerinin alan kuramı bağlamında incelenmesi. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 50(4), 33–82.
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Çev.). Siyasal Kitabevi.
- Çetin, S. (2022). Güç, iktidar ve özgürlük ilişkisi yönüyle Homo academicus. Liberal Düşünce Dergisi, 27(107), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.36484/liberal.1027150
- Durmuş, Ş. (2024). Akademisyenlerin izlenim yönetimi taktiklerinin iş performansı üzerindeki etkisi: Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi örneği. BIIBFAD, 8(2), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.1462089
- Erdem, R. (2019). Üniversiteler nereden nereye gidiyor? İçinde R. Erdem (Ed.), Akademide arka sokaklar: Türkiye’deki üniversitelerin informal yüzü (ss. 1–18). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
- Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
- Foucault, M. (2023). İktidarın gözü (I. Ergüden, Çev.). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
- Goffman, E. (2020). Damga: Örselenmiş kimliğin idare edilişi üzerine notlar. Heretik Yayıncılık.
- Goffman, E. (2021). Günlük yaşamda benliğin sunumu (B. Cezar, Çev.). Metis Yayınları.
- İbn Haldun. (2017). Mukaddime (Cilt 1–2; Z. K. Ugan, Çev.). İlgi Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık.
- İbn Haldun. (2024). Mukaddime. Ensar Neşriyat.
- İmamoğlu, M. (2024). Üniversite–iktidar ilişkisi üzerine sosyolojik bir araştırma: Foucault ve Bourdieu (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. https://hdl.handle.net/11452/47373
- Kılıç, M. (2013). Akademinin sosyolojisine dair bir derkenar: Akademia’nın sosyo-psikolojik dinamikleri. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 3(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.13.008
- Kvale, S. (2011). Doing interviews. Sage Publications.
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
- Mardin, Ş. (1985). Türk siyasasını açıklayabilecek bir anahtar: Merkez-çevre ilişkileri. İçinde A. Cemal (Genel Yönetmen.), Dün ve bugün: Felsefe (s. 165–197). Bilim Felsefe Sanat Yayınları. İstanbul.
- Mardin, Ş. (2024). Türkiye’de toplum ve siyaset (M. Türköne & T. Önder, Der.). İletişim Yayınları.
- Paçacı, M., & Erdem, R. (2021). Akademik örgütlerde üstlenilen informal roller üzerine nitel bir çalışma. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 11(2 Pt 2), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.20.708259
- Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Scott, J. C. (2021). Tahakküm ve direniş sanatları: Gizli senaryolar (A. Türker, Çev.). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
- Swartz, D. (2022). Kültür ve iktidar: Pierre Bourdieu’nün sosyolojisi (E. Gen, Çev.). İletişim Yayınları.
- Tekin, M. (2023). İbn Haldun’un bedeviyet-hadariyet sosyolojisi. Vuslat Dergisi, (268).
- Tüfekçi, N., Sezer Korucu, K., & Yorulmaz, R. (2019). Akademisyenlerin imkân, itibar ve imaj ekseninde değerlendirilmesi. İçinde R. Erdem (Ed.), Akademide arka sokaklar (ss. 293–315). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
- Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (12. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
- Yılmaz, E. (2023). Erving Goffman: Günlük yaşamda benliğin sunumu [Kitap incelemesi]. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 24, 31–35.